|
To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 9.0.124 or greater is installed. While GA advocacy groups like the AOPA and the NBAA support mandatory education for pilots flying in and near restricted airspace and have taken considerable steps on their own initiative to provide educational materials regarding the airspace restrictions, they strongly oppose stricter penalties and believe that administrative actions and fines already available to the FAA along with the potential threat of a shoot down already serve as sufficient deterrents for inadvertent airspace violations.98 These groups have voiced significant concerns over the impact of airspace restrictions and homeland security regulations on air commerce and the freedom of movement by air. These groups have also opposed comprehensive legislative measures, such as H.R. 3397, that mandate broad security requirements over the wide range of GA airports and operations cautioning that imposing such mandates “...would be ridiculously expensive, is unnecessary, and ignores the guiding principle of making investments in security based on risk.”99 In response to this criticism, attempting to tailor homeland security policy to fit the risk posed by widely varied GA operations, allocating budgets and resources to address security priorities, and addressing concerns about potentially impeding air commerce or compromising aviation safety are likely to remain ongoing challenges for the Congress. 98 Spencer S. Hsu. “Bill Targets Errant Pilots.” The Washington Post, August 22, 2005, p. B1. 99 Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Congressional Bill Threatens GA With Expensive Security Mandates. Frederick, MD (July 22, 2005).
中国通航网 www.ga.cn 通航翻译 www.aviation.cn 本文链接地址：Securing General Aviation 通用航空安保(58) |
